Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF BAIG versus REHMAT ALI

According to the section 13 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the performance of the affidavit filed on the Section 100 Student Obituary and the Student Assent, 139 2000 plaintiff's performance date is 27-2000, which the trial court dismissed. In the second appeal by the High Court, the correct verdict was recorded that the plaintiff had proved the petitioner e-post by a registered notice dated 5-2000 2000 that the courts below had ignored the date of the petitioner's plea. 8 2000 The High Court has corrected such an error in dealing with history. The language was referred to as slip 279 2000 but the question of translating any evidence against the record on the basis of mere slip could not be sustained by the High Court against the evidence in the courts below. The conclusions of the case were properly reversed and the wrongful Supreme Court dismissed the petition. For leave to appeal in the circumstances

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MUHAMMAD SAFDAR RANA v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2009 PLC(CS) 627
• HAQ NAWAZ v. MUHAMMAD KABIR 2009 SCMR 630
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. TAHIR LATIF 2009 PLC(CS) 634
• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, LAHORE v. JAVED MALIK 2009 SCMR 634
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF 2009 PLD 644
• GHULAM SHABBIR v. Mst. BAKHAT KHATOON 2009 SCMR 644
• AL-MADAN COAL COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. v. REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION 2009 CLD 645
• CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN v. Miss NASREEN PERVEZ 2009 PLC(CS) 650

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

property advocates from Charsada lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes