Find a Lawyer

AXLE PRODUCTS LIMITED versus ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN LTD.

Sections 9 and 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25 and 185 (3) apply to the former party decree aside by publishing in the respondent's press that the defendants were affected Personal services were not affected. Either by bailiff or by registered post or courier. And it was affixed to the summons address, where the defendant's office was prevented from excluding such application in which the banking court appealed through the High Court to the Financial Institutions section 9 (financing). Retained the legality of the Restoration Ordinance 2001. Because the summons services differed across CPCs by all methods, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal to consider whether alternative services would be justified without resorting to other methods. And that a law that provides a special procedure for trial in banking matters can only be a tale of a [rational classification group] and is the same principle merely a summation of the Financial Institutions (Financial Recovery) Ordinance, 2001. Can extend the service-related section to 9. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF v. State 2009 PLD 814
• Mst. GULSHAN BIBI v. State 2009 SCMR 819
• TALIB HUSSAIN v. State 2009 SCMR 825
• SAEED AKHTAR v. State 2009 SCMR 834
• PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director v. PRIVATIZATION COMMISSIONER, through Secretary 2009 SCMR 838
• Mian MUHAMMD AMAR YOUSAF v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 843
• QAISER JAVED MALIK v. PERVAIZ HAMEED 2009 SCMR 846
• MUBARAK ALI v. FIRST PRUDENTIAL MODARABA 2009 CLD 849

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

divorce advocates from Harnai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes