The Special Court of Rehabilitation of the Section 5 reversed the decision of the family court in favor of the suit for the restoration of the settlement between the parties; the appeal filed by the husband was dismissed by the lower appellate court on this basis. That for the purpose of filing a written statement, the husband could not be obliged to appear before the Family Court and his attendance could not be waived, and since the husband filed the written statement through a special counsel, the case was disputed. The verdict was stayed and the order passed by the lower appellate court was upheld by the high court, the lower Such a view of Peel was contrary to the High Court's earlier view that neither party could be justified simply because, as the case / written statement may be, the party concerned, not personally, but his / her own Presented by husband's lawyer. The wife agreed to pay the installments, therefore, the Supreme Court directed the lawyer to deposit the money. The Supreme Court of the Constitutions directed the Family Court to initiate the proceedings to recover the balance, In the case of non-payment of two installments, the appeal was settled
