The scope of the declaration against the orders of the officer of stability, including Article 26 of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Board of Revenue of the Civil Court, in this case For the statement filed by. The plaintiff was simultaneously dismissed by the two lower courts and the High Court's accuracy plaintiff challenged the various orders passed by the Consolidation Officers and the Board of Revenue Adjustment, and the distribution of shares in the stability operation Special jurisdiction of the court. He could not appeal even if he was not explicitly excluded, the jurisdiction of the civil court was banned. The jurisdiction of the civil court was banned under the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance 1960. Was made, even if such allegations were made in a plea bargain. This decision was made by the plaintiff through fraud and misrepresentation because of the provision of section 26 of the West Pakistan Stability, Holding Ordinance, 1960, which failed to present a case of instability, fraud or jurisdiction, He will not be attracted to the matter. In the absence of any illegal interference or instability in the Supreme Court immovable order, it was unthinkable
