Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus REHAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Delay in filing the first appeal against Article 3 (rial) trial verdict and subsequently on the basis of the order of the District Judge, the appeal shall be dismissed on the basis of sanctions and after sufficient notice the court fee The non-payment was said to have been held by the High Court. In the absence of any kind of delayed concession, the leave application is valid for departure

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. DILAWAR KHAN 2009 SCMR 756
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMNIAD AYUB STONE CRUSHERS 2009 CLD 756
• NAEEM IQBAL v. NOREEN SALEEM 2009 PLD 757
• PAKISTAN NAVY v. PIR MUHAMMAD KHAN 2009 SCMR 757
• Mirza MUHAMMAD INAYAT SARAF v. Mst. NASIM AKHTAR 2009 SCMR 759
• TAUQEER AHMAD QURESHI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2009 PLD 760
• POST MASTER-GEN1rRAL, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR v. LIAQUAT ALI 2009 SCMR 763
• TANVEER SHAUKAT v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NAROWAL 2009 SCMR 764

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocate from Gambet lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes