Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ MINHAS versus MST. SURRIYA SABIR MINHAS

Article 185 (3) Anonymous Transaction The findings of the three courts below on the question of fact did not suffer from any illegal, weak, misrepresentation or failure to read evidence, in which case, always intervening decisions. Was reluctant. Of the lower courts

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MUHAMMAD TAJ v. ARSHAD MEHMOOD 2009 SCMR 114
• MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD 2009 PLC(CS) 114
• Haji PEER BAKHSH v. UNION COUNCIL, BOLHARI 2009 PLC(CS) 119
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2009 SCMR 120
• NAJAM-UZ-ZAMAN v. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, G.H.Q., RAWALPINDI 2009 PLC(CS) 127
• FAISAL HUSSAIN BUTT v. State 2009 SCMR 133
• MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. State 2009 SCMR 135
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM (AMIR ASLAM) v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, RAWALPINDI 2009 SCMR 141

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kamalia Musa lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes