MUHAMMAD ASLAM (AMIR ASLAM) versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, RAWALPINDI
Article 9 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 571A, 173 and 344 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), which had been in jail for the last eight months, was not a single witness. The case has so far been investigated and the trial was being delayed on any pretext or according to the court's order, the Medical Board conducted several inspections on the accused for multiple injuries and his injuries. An ankle break was revealed. , In which police brutality shows that the chemical examiner's initial report found no trace of \ chars of, which asked for more samples, which, for examination, sections 173 and 344 Needed formal status, CCP didn't have. Was complied with and the challan was not presented against the accused within the stipulated period, which resulted in severe abuse of the content of the file, resulting in no offense against the accused, The face of the man was charged. It was unfounded and there was no possibility of conviction, there was no restriction in the way the trial court proceeded to abolish the charge, which would be a waste of time and time. As a result of the ban, requests for leave appeals were changed under which jail authorities were instructed to release the suspects. \ r \ n
