Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the evidence was proved on the record of the accused's participation in the commission of the crime, which repeatedly caused it. The two victims were stabbed by a knife and his wife and mother-in-law were highly reputable. Medical evidence, psychiatrist, serologist brutal and information of the perpetrator of the atrocity was completely complained of in the recovery of the knife in which the accused committed both murders and demanded no relaxation in the sentence. Was. No illegal or vulnerable type was found and punishment of the accused was maintained accordingly.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2009 SCMR 120
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ MINHAS v. Mst. SURRIYA SABIR MINHAS 2009 SCMR 124
• NAJAM-UZ-ZAMAN v. ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, G.H.Q., RAWALPINDI 2009 PLC(CS) 127
• FAISAL HUSSAIN BUTT v. State 2009 SCMR 133
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM (AMIR ASLAM) v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, RAWALPINDI 2009 SCMR 141
• SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE v. ZAHOOR AHMAD JAVED 2009 PLC(CS) 141
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. SHAHID ULLAH 2009 PLD 146
• SHAHZAD AHMED v. Mian MUAZZAM SHAH 2009 SCMR 150

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

law firms from Mastoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes