Section 497 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) bail, Principal Court grant under section 497 (2), No need to investigate defense version to advance CRPC bail application But he had. Temporarily review previously prepared material and see if any aspect proves, the defendant's involvement in the commission of the crime, if the request is granted on the basis of which he was released on bail. Will be misunderstood. The version of the eye witnesses that was excluded by witnessing against the version of the ocular witnesses at an early stage of the trial. Which course was not valid and no such evidence was presented later, then it would not be free from doubt and, according to section 497 (2), in the present case, even the PC evidence of the eyewitnesses. Was deleted Medical opinion by the High Court police along with the trial court did not require hundreds of people to be examined during the investigation to determine if the accused was involved in the crime or whether the police needed it on the record. Consider the available material and do not neglect eyewitnesses to say that they were not involved in the commission of the crime, and thus they will not only be entitled to bail, but will be acquitted simultaneously. In the specific circumstances of the case, the trial court as well as the Supreme Court's practice of the High Court did not define the reasons which led to the extension of the hail to the accused in the Supreme Court. The rt changed the application for leave to appeal in the appeal and was filed by the High Court accused.
