Find a Lawyer

ZOHRA KHANUM versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149/109 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) guarantee, grant of further investigation even if the story of the prosecution in which the accused / The applicant went and called the complaining party, it is believed, there was no allegation that the applicant had picked up a gun or asked the assailants to fire at the complaining party. Further inquiries with the co-accused will be required; the applicant, who was a woman, has been in judicial closure for more than 10 months. Was appealed to and allowed. She was admitted on bail

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• NASRULLAH v. MUHAMMAD ZAHEER 2009 SCMR 745
• MUHAMMAD ABDUL RASHEED v. JAMIA MASJID GHOSIA 2009 SCMR 747
• MUHAMMAD ASHIQ v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE through Chairman 2009 SCMR 749
• MUHAMMAD QURAB KHAN v. State 2009 PLD 749
• MUHAMMAD HANEEF v. ABDUL SAMAD 2009 PLD 751
• MUHAMMAD YASEEN v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2009 SCMR 753
• FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. DILAWAR KHAN 2009 SCMR 756
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMNIAD AYUB STONE CRUSHERS 2009 CLD 756

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

famous supreme court advocate from Narowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes