Article 9 (c) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-Xin of 1965), Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (e) High Court charged with trafficking / transporting large quantities of drugs, weapons and ammunition. While dismissing the appeal, the petitioners, hearing all the advice, highlighted every aspect of the case, which was recorded on the evidence, they were rightly praised by the trial court. Maintained, which provided the exact and definitive reasons. No illegal interference, irregularity or misinterpretation of evidence can be identified to allow leave to appeal. The High Court has examined all the record-based evidence by conducting a threadbare examination of every record-based evidence, which contains no fragments of evidence. The nature of the prosecution was misidentified, ignored or not really appreciated in the context of the recovery of 126kg of hashish from the prosecution witnesses and a sample from each of the stick and slab. Conflicts of evidence regarding the pick-up cannot be sustained, and the Chemical Examiner's report also supported the prosecution's case that the applicant was using an unusual route. Covering the secret palms of the vehicle by transporting marijuana, ammunition and ammunition, which reflects their knowledge that the driver and the driver of the vehicle for the long journey have the contents and articles for transport. Should have knowledge of the matter. Along with the court, the High Court neither affirmed the misconduct nor did it refute any evidence or lack of evidence.
