Section 2 (1) (e) (P), 3, 37 and 38 Abuse of dominant positions denied deals, penalties imposed was a company in Pakistan Steel Mills Steel Products manufacture and supply business. It has a 100% share in the relevant market, has had complete dominance in the low carbon steel belt market, which allegedly deserves the abuse it has been transferred to and refuses to provide it to some of its customers. Could not give to others and the Commission took notice of the news items themselves are all appearing in the media regarding the reduction of the supply of steel belts by the mills, but another downstream buyer also alleged that the mills. Commission management appointed inquiry officer for gross misconduct of steel bullets, as stated in its report The allegation against Mills was true, Mills was issued a showcase notice, the answer was not satisfactory, Mills was accused of refusing to supply low carbon steel against the deal deal was denied. used to describe a situation that under-taking refused to sell another business, was willing to sell only at a price that was considered \ too much \ or only ready to sell under the circumstances. T was considered unacceptable, thus qualifying it as an abuse of dominant position deal refusing to deal. And may be in vertical relationships, where there was no agreement to refuse to deal with your competitors or its products, he may refuse to deal with unilateral or vertical relationship, in the present case and Mills
