NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL(NLC) THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATION versus HAKAS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Sections 14, 7 and 39 were not entered into the court by the arbitrator for the rule of award, but it was filed by a party with a request under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. ? Submission of a signed copy of this award to a party on the request of the parties, or to the cause of the court, on behalf of the parties or to the cause of the arbitrator shall not mean that there was an arbitrator On behalf of the awarding authority, a competent authority to enter the award court on behalf of the court before the rule of the court, will act on its own mind, whether there is a reason for sending the award or any of the matters referred to the arbitration. Regardless of whether or not the award was liable, without such exercise, the court made the award on the basis of the court Or was it that no request for separation of award was filed because the awarding party had no opinion or the arbitrator's authority to file the award, the unpaid order was manifestly invalid and was set aside had gone
