Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR AHMAD versus NISAR BAIG, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, ISLAMABAD

Section 17 Insurance Application Grounds During the evidence of the landlord's personal need and the expiration of the lease agreement, the landlord allegedly did not provide any details of the personal requirement and could not give any relevant reason why. House building is needed. He wanted a damaged cover for his two wives and four children, who could not live together under one roof, were not taken in a request for evacuation, nor during cross-examination during his inspection in Chief Landlord. It was removed that he had another house in which he was staying. The family and that it leased a portion of it to the tenant, there was no provision in the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance 2001 that the tenant was allowed to be evicted due to the expiry of the lease agreement. Granted, though, the request for injunction was dismissed

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2010

• NATIONAL LOGISTIC CELL(NLC) through General Manager Administration v. HAKAS (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive 2010 YLR 1448
• AMJAD MASIH v. Mst. BUSHRA BIBI 2010 YLR 1468
• ZAFAR MEHMOOD v. KHAN AYAZ KHAN 2010 YLR 1490
• PAKISTAN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AUDIT DIVISION 2010 PTD 1506
• MUHAMMAD USMAN IQBAL JADOON v. Mst. SAADIA USMAN 2010 YLR 1539
• MUHAMMAD SULEMAN KHAN v. INTERNATIONAL TABACCO MACHINERY PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. 2010 YLR 1560
• MUHAMMAD YOUNAS MARWAT v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior 2010 YLR 1573
• RAI FARMS v. M.G. HERTZ (PVT.) LTD. 2010 YLR 1601

All Islamabad judgments of 2010 →

inheritance advocates near Makran lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes