Section 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Orally, the two courts down the landlord's request for removal of the tenant based on personal necessity, reconstruction and expiration of the lease agreements. Submitted their record in support of the version. Along with documentary evidence, it was revealed that he was selling and distributing electronic components in the rental complex. And he needed a destroyed premises for his own personal use to set up the business mentioned in his own premises. Withdrawal requests filed by the landlord were primarily accepted for his / her own personal needs. Was a subsidiary of shops and leasing period. Only because the property owner could not be improper because it met the personal requirement when filing an application under the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance 2001. The demolition of the damaged premises and that the lease has already expired. Counsel for the tenants that the lease expires, there is no reasonable basis for their eviction under section 17 of the Islamabad Rent Ordinance 2001. And that the reconstruction of the destroyed premises, along with the personal needs of the landlord, could not be taken together because the two were destructive to each other, bearing no weight on the facts and circumstances of the case. Or the legal weakness in the unpleasant decisions made by the above courts cannot be interfered with by the High Court in exercising its constitutional jurisdiction.
