JAW AID GHAFOOR versus PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Section 23 Civil Aviation Authority Service Regulations, Regulations 2 09, 2 20, 2 46, 2 50, 3 5, 3 31 and 3 33 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application applied on daily wages against any vacant Appointment as a Permanent Post Applicant Verbally Receives New Candidate Replacement by Permanent Service Removal and Authorization After 10 Years of Service Without Reason Notice Regln 3 31 Accordingly, the authority may appoint a person on a comfortable basis for an appointment. Urgent / Operational Requirement, but not against permanent, temporary or vacant vacancies, the applicant was appointed intermittently for a period of not more than 89 days, usually one day, which was approximately 10 years. Until then, the authority had given rise to such artificial intervals. Applicant services adjusted multiple employees against permanent vacancies to avoid gaining permanent employee authority status Permanent vacancies were still in place The Authority misused Regln 3 31 of the Civil Aviation Authority Regulations The THA's controversial process was illegal, and the Discrimination High Court rejected the defamation order, instructing the authority to issue a letter of appointment to the applicant and calculate its prior services toward retirement. Principles of pensionary benefits \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
