Find a Lawyer

ADAMJEE INSURA?TCE COMPANY LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus CAR CHASE THROUGH PARTNER

Section (c) theft policy, a claim under the stock car taken from the showroom to take the owner's claimant from his home to the bank and then to rob the car at the residence of the claimant of the insurance company, Theft of such a policy The theft policy covers two types of vehicles that are stored in the previously insured showroom or the storage of new and re-conditioned vehicles. And second, that the vehicles on both sides of the showroom looting the vehicles are parked on the open space or the respective claimant's release. There was time at the residence and neither he was in 'storied' nor 'standing', nor was in the showroom in a particular open space the vehicle that was being used by the claimant from his home to the bank or the showroom. Was taken for the purpose of driving, was not a vehicle that was kept insured or standing. Such a policy was not covered. Such claim was rejected in the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• PEARL CONTINENTAL HOTEL, KARACHI v. S. ZAMIRUL HAQUE 2010 PLC 276
• JAW AID GHAFOOR v. PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY 2010 PLC(CS) 276
• JAN MUHAMMAD alias JANO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 277
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. SANAULLAH WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. 2010 PTD 278
• GADAL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 280
• BLOCH KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Local Government, Karachi 2010 YLR 281
• AIJAZ MEHMOOD v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2010 YLR 282
• YAR MUHAMMAD v. RAFIQUE 2010 MLD 286

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Cherat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes