MASTER ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS
Sections 13 (4), 17 and 114 of the Trademark Rules, 2004, R85 Registration of the trademark is likely to cause confusion in the trademark, the appellant was the trademark owner and the defendant wanted the name of the trademark Registered with Plaintiff had raised through appellant that the defendant's proposed trade mark was similar to that of the trademark and there was a possibility that it would confuse the minds of the consumers which the order of accuracy approved by the Registrar. There was no speech, but since the two words were master and minister, clearly, clearly understood, phonetically different and even written in different types of faces, therefore, any possibility of confusion or deception The High Court refused to intervene in the order issued by the Registrar and the matter was registered Trar been denied custody for remand decisions. New appeals were dismissed under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
