FATIMA HOUSING SCHEME THOUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER HESCO CIRCLE-I, HYDERABAD
Article 22 and 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The provision of charges for constitutional application requests referred to the Authority for the installation of transformer and power connection for its premises. The bill was issued for Rs. 15000 and the installation of the electric connection, which accordingly was submitted by the applicant, however, the Authority did not install the transformer and failed to provide the electrical connection to the applicant authority. Only the applicant failed to establish transformer and power connection, but also go An advance bill was filed which shows the consumption of units with instructions for payment to the applicants. The bill could not be submitted for three months in the advance of the Electricity Act, 1910 under which the advance bill of payment was paid. Once the authority had received the required amount for the transformer and security deposit, it might not be interpretable, except that it was customary for the security demand notice to be in the same manner as before. In the words, there was a security deposit which was issued by the applicant to the authority. Advance through application had been submitted under the bill. Failure to justify such advance bill in any provision of the law for the Authority After receipt of the security deposit, the request of the authority through the advance bill, without constitutional application without legal authority, was allowed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
