KAWAS B. AGA versus CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI (CDGK) THROUGH NAZIM-E-ALA
Article 199 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 35 and 35, the costs of constitutional application, were enforced by the inability of the registration authorities to impose on the Public Department, in the process of processing and registering a renewed lease in relation to the property in question. Were unsuccessful. The High Court may, in its constitutional jurisdiction, provide the cost of compensation for such failures, as well as the ideal cost / penalty price in appropriate cases, for such failures, instead of the offending public officer. Can be obtained from the state / departments, as the state / department can recover from the compensation officer or the fine was imposed on the fine public functionary and the applicant was required to recover the claim along with the expense. The compensation was also entitled to expenses, therefore, the High Court directed the concerned department. Submitting the original costs and compensation costs of the petition, the High Court directed the relevant department to launch a criminal investigation against the offending officers and, if they committed such misconduct, then any disciplinary charges leveled against them. In addition to the action, they will also be charged prices.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
