Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BARKAT ALI versus STATE


Section 7497/8 498 The High Court does not express any opinion on the merits of the trial in dismissing the petition for grant of bail, but rather the High Court's order requesting the applicant to be removed within six months. Is also not subject to any kind of illegal interference or violation of any law or procedure related to bail and debate that the applicant should have released a very strong case on merit on bail. no
1979 S C M R 359

Present : G. Safdar Shah and Karam Elahee Chauhan, JJ

BARKAT ALI‑Petitioner

versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 17/P of 1979, decided on 23rd April 1979.

(Appeal against the judgment and order dated 4‑3‑1979 of the Peshawar High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6/79 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40/79).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑--

----Ss.497/498-Bail‑High Court expressing no opinion on merits of case in dismissing prayer for grant of bail and rather accommodat ing petitioner by directing appeal to be taken up out of turn within six months‑Order of High Court, held, not suffering from any illegality or any violation of law or of procedure relating to bail and contention that petitioner having a very strong case on merits High Court should have released him on bail not unable.

Raza A. Khan, Advocate Peshawar and M. Qasim Imam, Advocate‑on- Record (absent) for Petitioner.

Nemo for the State.

Date of hearing : 23rd April 4979.

ORDER

KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN, J

.‑The petitioner filed Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 1979 in the High Court of Peshawar against the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Peshawar dated 4‑2‑1979 whereby he was convicted under section 302/34, P. P.‑ C: and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000 or in default to undergo further six months' R. I. In that appeal the petitioner filed Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 6/79 praying for being released on bail. A Division Bench of the Peshawar High Court by means of their Order dated 4‑3‑1979 directed that the appeal may be fixed up for hearing within six months from the date of their order. Since a very early hearing of the case had been fixed, therefore, the learned Judges ‑refused to release the petitioner on bail.

2. The petitioner has come up in a Petition for Special Leave to Appeal against the aforesaid Order, to this Court.

3. Learned counsel argued that his client has a very strong case on merits, and, therefore, the High Court should have released him on bail. The contention has no merit. The High Court has expressed no opinion or the merits of the case and they have rather accommodated the petitioner by directing that his appeal be taken up out of turn within six months. The Order of the High Court does not suffer from any illegality or any violation of law or of procedure on the subject.

4. The petition has no merit and is dismissed.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Tarbela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.