The plaintiff's complaint concerning the declaration of titles 39, 42 and 54, the cancellation of the documents and the collection of damages was that the defendants had fraudulently prepared the fake and fraudulent documents in connection with his property and for that reason The evidence of its validity was mental tort damages / compensation was not final and the plaintiff did not present any evidence as to the fact that the plaintiff intended to deprive the plaintiff of fraud by forfeiting his property. Was fully formed against the defendants and there was a process of communion between the defendants which should be punished. ??? The plaintiff is deeply shocked to learn of the fraudulent transfer of her property through fraudulent and fraudulent documents, because of her unlawful activities, her failure to inspire other illegal activities in the future. Hurts mentally. The plaintiff was not able to use and enjoy his property ND made many profitable for the sale of his property during the rising economic periods, in addition to the legal costs and costs of prosecuting the defendants. Opportunities would have been wasted, the High Court declared the plaintiff to be a lawyer and sale contract, usually by the legitimate owner of the property and the accused. There were fake and fabricated documents and they were canceled and canceled. The High Court placed the burden on the plaintiff with the intent to defraud the plaintiff of his property on the basis of forgery and payment of compensation and the creation of fraudulent powers and forfeiture.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
