Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PETROMARK (PVT.) LIMITED versus ALI TRADERS


Sections 39 and 40 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O IX, R 6 Trademark infringement Ex-party decree Defendant, Plaintiff's absence alleges that Defendants use the same or other color scheme, design and Is violating its trademark. The lawsuit filed by the plaintiff was confirmed on oath, which also filed its affidavit along with some documents in support of his claim, although the defendant neither proceeded to contest the claim of the plaintiff, although to serve them. The attempt was made twice in the year 2005, and the year after that, 2009, when the remand was obtained in the appeal of the case but no one was ready to contest the case, assessing the effect of the plaintiff was irrational and unconstitutional. Happened, so no material was recorded on the plaintiff's damages, so the High Court refused to pass the order. The extent of the damages made was decided accordingly

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Sangote lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.