Find a Lawyer

MST. AYESHA versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 448/386/34 Sindh Public Property (Termination of Expulsions) Act (V of 1975), Section 7 House Conspiracy, Extortion and Imprisonment Interim Guarantees, Conviction Bans and Land Verification will depend on the outcome of the civil suit pending between the parties; a civil suit between the parties should have been decided when the interim bail was granted to the accused before the criminal proceedings were taken, the same terms and conditions were confirmed. Was.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 572
• Mrs. SURRIYA AFZAL v. ALIM SHEIKH 2010 CLC 572
• ALI HUSSAIN alias ALI HASSAN v. State 2010 YLR 572
• MERCK MARKER (PVT.) LTD. v. UNITEC PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. 2010 MLD 573
• PETROMARK (PVT.) LIMITED v. ALI TRADERS 2010 CLD 578
• KHAN MUHAMMAD MAHESAR v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (SINDH) 2010 PCrLJ 579
• Engineer WALI MUHAMMAD MEMON v. MEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 2010 MLD 582
• ABDUL KARIM v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION JAMSHORO 2010 PCrLJ 585

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

advocate from Rawat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes