WORKS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT
R7 Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XXVII of 2001), Sections 116 and 193 Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption Act (VII of 1991), Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution on Fees The approval of the approval of this levy issued by the Town Nazim on the Marriage Hall / Lance by the Town Nazim based on the proposal of the Town Council on the date of 2 10 2007 will show the difference between such dates. There is no resolution to issue notifications on. There was no reference to the nature of the merger halls / lawns in such a resolution on 6 2 2007, and the approved rates are reflected in the manner in which such notification is reflected in the notification reflected in the notification. The proposal was a negative one and such resolution was in accordance with Section 116 of the Sindh Local Government. The Government Ordinance, 2001, required the Town Nazim to issue the notification in accordance with the Town Council-approved contract, but they did not accept the marriage owners from the fees received by the Town Nazim on the basis of the invalid notification by the Town Councilor. But a commission of fraud and misconduct was made in which the fees were paid by the Town Manager. The Halls / Lens High Court set aside the unwanted notification by the Town Manager to be issued without any legal authorization; Section 21, PPC, means the Town Nazim as a civil servant, as well as Sindh Inquiries and Anti-Corruption. Schedule offense under the 1991 Act was committed. He directed the Chief Secretary to take appropriate action against the Town Registrar within the stipulated time and the Marriage Hall / L acquired from them under the invalid notification.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
