Find a Lawyer

MIR MUHAMMAD versus STATE

In the case of Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (a) intoxicating bail, the grant of the case was punishable by up to two years imprisonment or a fine or neither sample was obtained from the recovered heroin, But only 10 were made for chemical inspection. No evidence on the remaining heroin, whether or not it is heroin, could be temporarily imprisoned for 12 grams of heroin if positive chemical testing was reported. The accused was admitted to bail, leaving the accused behind bars

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MASOOD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 600
• MANZOOR v. State 2010 YLR 602
• AMEER GULA v. GULAB NOOR 2010 MLD 604
• AERO ASIA INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. v. SHELL PAKISTAN LIMITED 2010 YLR 611
• IQBAL AHMED v. State 2010 MLD 614
• JAMEEL AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 618
• WORKS COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through City District Government 2010 CLC 621
• RIZWAN AHMED v. State 2010 YLR 622

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Kot Addu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes