MUHAMMAD ASLAM PERVAIZ versus AL-MUSTAFA WELFARE SOCIETY
Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 18 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Defaulting to tenants in payment of monthly rent Issuance of change of ownership notice Proof Postal Invoices The permit to be filed by the landlord was obtained on the rent that the tenant had received notice of the change of ownership and had made a predetermined promise in payment of the rent that the lower The appellate court rejected both the findings of the tenant and allowed the appeal to be filed about the tenant. The notice was sent under section 18 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, and the proof of it was related to the landlord but receiving notice to other tenants did not mean that the tenant had also received notice that the landlord had established it. Was unable to make the notice that the tenant was rarely received. If the landlord could have prepared the receipt of the postage, his assistance would have been reached by kicking off Section 27 of the General Clause Act, 1897, and thus failing to prove in favor of the analogous service that the Sindh Retired Premises Ordinance, section 1979. The notice given to the tenant under section 18, however, was not fatal under section 15 (2) (II) in respect of the landlord default. Under the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, tenants were liable for eviction if the rent was not paid 60 days after which the rent for the month of May was fixed on June 10 and on August 60. Expired, therefore, the day the money order was claimed was sent by the tenant ie the default occurred on 25 8 2000.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
