MUHAMMAD ASIF RANA versus ABDUL MAJEED ALI M. SABADIA
Section 15 (2) (ii), proviso [as filed by the Indus Tenant Clause (Amendment) Ordinance (XIV of 2001]), default of tenant in payment of rent, section 15 (2) (ii) Providence's application under the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, applies to the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 only when the four conditions are satisfied that the payment is for default in rent. The withdrawal request was filed on a single basis. ; This default will not exceed six months. On the first date of the hearing, the tenant has claimed that he accepts his obligation to pay the rent. And this was not the first default case and the rental controller instructed the tenant to pay his claim rent on or before the date fixed for the purpose when the four terms were covered by section 15 (2). ) Was met with the approval of Clause (ii). If the ordinance was initiated on the basis of not having a single condition, it has been stated that the proviso could not be applied in the case. In the present case, the default was specifically ruled out for such specific denial. In the presence of and in the absence of a clear statement of responsibility. The tenant cannot claim benefit from this section pursuant to Section 15 (2) (ii) of the Tenant Ordinance.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
