UNIVERSAL BLOCK versus II-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH
Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to determine fair rent, jurisdiction of tenants overcoming rent was controlled by the tenant of rent installments and all rent for the same building and its adjoining rent. The rent was maintained by the Lower Appellate Court. The cost of the buildings is Rs 7 to Rs 8 per square foot in each shop and such rent was fixed nine years before the order was passed by the rent controller. Given the application approval period, the rental controller had set a reasonable rental cost. 10 per square foot per month and he did not demand interference by the High Court in the constitutional jurisdiction, but the rental controller did not face any unlawful action or any evidence. Was based on misinterpretation, nor was record records neglected by material evidence. The fact recorded by the two forums below was all evidence recorded or otherwise available on record. Therefore, under Article 199 of the constitution, it cannot be disturbed by the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, for rent payments for rent in installments can be ordered, so that the court can spend considerable time in settlement. Strictly avoided as a result of the Act. Applying for Rent The High Court directed the tenant to pay the arrears of rent in six equal installments within a period of 18 months, taking into account the difficulties and delay in handling the case.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
