HAKEEMUDDIN versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS AND EXCISE) THROUGH DIRECTOR, KARACHI
Sections 32, 154, 171 and 187 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Proof of Smuggled Vehicle Owners Customers seized the applicant's vehicle as it was alleged that the applicant had seized the vehicle. Prepared a book of registration and three letters issued. In filing the registration book only without paying due attention to the Pakistan Coast Guard, the Pakistan Coast Guard, which is demonstrating its purchase at the auction, did not create a valid document of ownership of the vehicle itself. Any sales transaction through the source had to be fully supported. In particular, the Pakistan Coast Guards from whom the vehicle was purchased were told to pay the said amount, in the absence of challan, a significant amount of the vehicle appears to have been deposited, only to be registered. Did not make legitimate ownership of the vehicle. Pakistan Coast Guards refused to sell or the auction vehicle in question and labeled as fake and fabricated applicants relied on it because the fake and fabricated applicant had custom. Authorities did not file a counter-affidavit at the Pakistan Coast Guard's position that the vehicle was smuggled. It was also disputed, therefore, this vehicle was not improper property or was purchased by the applicant in question was smuggled, therefore, the customs authorities have taken into account the Customs Act, 1969 Notice was issued under section 171, the same customs authorities were justified in confiscation and removal, but the petitioner refused to interfere with the same order.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
