Find a Lawyer

ALI GHULAM versus STATE

In violation of bail in section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), sections 392, 459 and 34 of theft and concealment, the defendants, under a grant of further investigation, filed a preliminary case for grant of bail. Nor was any direct role assigned. Neither identity was paraded nor any recovery proceedings nor filing of FIR was delayed for about six to six days; In these circumstances the suspicion could not be declared free and further investigation is needed. The suspects, under the circumstances, were granted bail

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. EMIRATES BANK INTERNATIONAL PJSC 2010 CLD 1057
• SADAM HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 1060
• SAEEN BUX v. CIVIL JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MATIARI 2010 PCrLJ 1060
• HAKEEMUDDIN v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION (CUSTOMS AND EXCISE) through Director, Karachi 2010 PTD 1060
• UNIVERSAL BLOCK v. II-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI SOUTH 2010 CLC 1064
• IRSHAD JATOI v. State 2010 MLD 1065
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM v. State 2010 MLD 1068
• MAHMOOD NAWAZ alias MITHOO v. State 2010 MLD 1075

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Shedani sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes