KARACHI CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION THROUGH PRESIDENT versus STATE
Sections 9, 10, 12, 13 and 18 of the Freezing of Property in Corrupt and Corrupt Practices Reference was filed against the accuser of the definition of evidence alleging that he had collected various properties, which It is disproportionate to known sources. And that one of the properties the defendant gifted to the appellant / charity association was the appellant's dispute that it should not have been properly included in the reference because it was not owned by the accused, but the same appellant. (Charitable Association) is a petition filed by the appellant under section 13 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, objecting to such freezing, the appeal of the appellant by the trial court to the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 Being completely different from section 13, the trial court should have paid attention. On prayer and not on section 13, the trial court, in the circumstances, did not consider the application in its original context and went in the wrong direction; if a wrong part of the application was cited, it should pass a legal order to the court. If the matter was referred to the trial court, the State Council had no objection. The impeachment order was set aside to decide the petition in accordance with the law and directed the trial court. Was asked to consider the claim clause of the petition and then make the same decision in accordance with the law which stated that the petition was subject to suspension Will be considered.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
