Sections 3 and 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 417 and 265K were filed against the respondents / accused who were acquitted of unlawful liquidation, the appellant / complainant filed a complaint against the accused complainant and one such The accused, who was a real brother, had three sisters, who were the co-owners of the property in question on inheritance. And other than the complainant, the other co-owners claimed that they had sold the property. The complainant had also filed a criminal case by lodging an FIR with different stories and versions of the same incident and the accused could not be tried on the seat nor could he be punished twice. The alleged proceedings under the provisions of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, could not be sustained before the trial court before acquitting the accused under Section 265 K, CR PC at any stage, if the trial court's opinion Section 265K, CR PC provisions. In this case, the jurisdiction and discretion exercised by the trial court at any stage after acquitting the accused may be exercised, in the present case the trial court had previously considered the material and the fate of the case. Because the dispute was between brothers and sisters. Harassment and unnecessary infringement on the basis of the rights of the owners / indicators and the parties concerned in the trial and hearing of this case before the Bench Trial Court only on the property being sub-judicial before the court. Because there was no possibility of the respondents as the accused and the tra
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
