Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 377 sodomy guarantee, irregular delay in filing FIR and medical examination of the victims were done after 20 days, the father of one of the victims, who is alleged Was subjected to physical abuse. He presented his affidavit before the court, stating that there was no unnatural crime with his son, which led to a case which would require further investigation. The accused was released on bail. Had gone, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Dr. MUHAMMAD ABRAR YOUNUS v. State 2010 YLR 1674
• ABDUL FATTAH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1674
• ZAHID KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1680
• DAMSAZ v. ASSISTANT MUKHTIARKAR REVNEUE/SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTARTE 2010 MLD 1681
• KARACHI CHARITABLE ASSOCIATION through President v. State 2010 MLD 1692
• SUHRAB SANDANO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1692
• NIAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1696
• MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. MUHAMMAD HANIF LAKHANI 2010 YLR 1697

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

advocate from Shahkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes