MACKS ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL CO. THROUGH ATTORNEY versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Section 20 (1) (b) suits for mortgage stock shortages claim that the defendant / bank has exploited the mortgaged stock lawyer illegally, claiming only US $ Price is limited to the stock shortage. 37,750 Council for the respondent / bank stated that the plaintiff had made his claim on the shortage of inventory. And it is mentioned in the official report of the Agnesi that although the bank letter caused a shortfall, the letter was never disclosed in the evidence where the promised stock of the bank was found to be missing or damaged, liability. Loans completely to the bank to compensate the lender. However, in order to make the bank liable for any shortages, it was up to the borrower that there was indeed a shortage, though the mortgagee's right to obtain the documents in the bank's custody to remove the stock shortage. But neither the letter that was sent in the official Assignee report was submitted, though it was with him, nor the relevant record of the defendant / bank was sought from the bank so that no one in the mortgage stock No evidence was found to be deductible or on record. Which can prove that there is a shortage of inventory that was given to the defendant / bank suit, in the circumstances it was excluded \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
