Find a Lawyer

SHOUKAT versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Qatil Um Bell, denied the charge against the accused when he was holding the hand of the accused while the co-accused threw the victim's forehead. He alleged that the victim's hand was not caught, then that the deceased may have been able to save himself by trying to escape or flee, the suspect was involved in a suspected crime, because he was a co-accused. Was helped to work with. The accused was charged, first related to the crime when he facilitated the commission of the crime and it appeared that the accused's request for bail was dismissed, in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• IRFAN MAJEED v. UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Vice-Chancellor/Registrar, University Campus,Karachi 2010 PLC(CS) 1118
• MUHAMMAD ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1120
• CHINCHOO v. State 2010 MLD 1121
• GUL HASSAN v. ZAHOOR AHMED 2010 PCrLJ 1128
• ARJUN v. CIVIL JUDGE AND MAGISTRATE NO.1, MITHI 2010 PCrLJ 1140
• ROYAL GROUP through Attorney v. REZA IQBAL 2010 CLC 1144
• ABID AZIZ ASHRAFI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1148
• AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (PAKISTAN) LTD. v. COMMISSIONER, SINDH EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION 2010 PLC(CS) 1150

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kalar Syedian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes