OT, R 10 (2) The tort suit sought to have the defendant plead for the defendant in the matter in his plea seeking to exclude himself from the defendant's line, claiming that he did not It is neither necessary nor a proper party suit; he has submitted that no allegation has been made against him in Medina nor any relief has been sought against him; the effect is either compulsory or appropriate. Be a party and if not then he was a stranger in the process and should not do so. Make a party under Order I, R 10 (2), the CPC specifically gave the court the power to strike any party, including the defendant, at the request of any party or at any stage of the proceedings. If the plaintiff is found, then there is neither a necessary nor proper party then he can be attacked. Plaintiff indicated that the defendant / applicant was not a party to the matter, that was, not a party, or without which there could be no effective declaration in his favor. The cause of action claimed by the plaintiff was based on the alleged mental torture, the damages it caused and the damages it caused to the defendant himself or herself, according to defendant's stumble. It was possible, if the plaintiff had succeeded in establishing his claim, that the appropriate party to pass judgment in his favor without the defendant / applicant was a party whose presence would have been necessary in order for the court to make an effective and complete decision. And be able to resolve all the questions involved. One of the influences of the respondents / applicants involved in the trial
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
