Find a Lawyer

IMRAN BHATTI versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH HOME SECRETARY, KARACHI

Section 496A / 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), co-accused / alleged kidnapper of Article 199 FIR recorded his statement before the Judicial Magistrate that he had married the accused with his free will and he Unbeknownst to her, she was also a lady with any of their former marriages. After the alleged kidnapping statement before the Judicial Magistrate, it was clear that he had never been abducted and a false FIR was filed by his father. The powers of co-accused / alleged kidnappers can be used to prevent court proceedings from being misused so that the court can terminate the High Court FIR for promotion of the Supreme Court cases where the complaint was serious and in which There was no special charge and obviously there was no crime. Fired; and after an alleged kidnapper statement that he was not abducted and that he had freely married the accused, an FIR was lodged against the accused. And the accused had no chance of punishment. Holding an FIR will be like abusing the court process

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• EIJAZ AHMED SHAH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Establishment Secretary, Cabinet secretariat Establishment Di 2010 PLD 309
• Haji MUHAMMAD ALI KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 310
• KHAN alias KHAN MUHAMMAD MANGRIO v. State 2010 MLD 311
• GHULAM MUJTABA PARACHA v. MUHAMMAD SALEEM 2010 CLD 311
• MUREED v. State 2010 MLD 318
• Mst. NASREEN v. MUHAMMAD ARIF 2010 YLR 318
• GUL HASSAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 321
• AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 322

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Dhatmal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes