Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus STATE

Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/109/34 Conviction Bail, refusing to delay 4/2 hours in filing FIR, was fully explained to the accused at the bailout stage. Will not entitle the accused to be arrested. Witnesses' statements suggested that both incidents were leading to honor killings because the suspects were suspected of having an illicit relationship between the victim and his sister, to show their absence. Didn't offer anything. In the ward where the victim was killed, the prosecution had enough material to link the accused to the commission of the crime;

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2010 YLR 901
• ZAFAR H. ISMAIL v. Mrs. RUBINA ALI AAMIR 2010 YLR 902
• NABI BUX JAHEJO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Agriculture 2010 PLC(CS) 902
• BANK OF PUNJAB v. FIRST NATIONAL EQUITIES LIMITED 2010 CLD 903
• Mst. AFROZE alias AFSHAN v. State 2010 MLD 907
• ZOHAIB HASAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2010 YLR 908
• SHAHEEN MULTI FOODS (PVT.) LTD. (FLOUR MILLS) through Chief Executive v. ABDUL HAFEEZ RAJPUT 2010 CLC 908
• MEHBOOB AHMAD SOOMRO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 911

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates email from Chaman lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes