Find a Lawyer

ZOHAIB HASAN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Article 199 Constitutional Application Academic / Institutional Applicant applied for admission and passed his / her written retention test, but his name was not mentioned in the final list of successful candidates as only 126 candidates qualified for the exam. All of them gave their first choice of subject (MBA), all 126 candidates were required to appear in the interview for the above subject while the first 50 candidates were admitted to the MBA, while the applicant was present. The number 77 on the list of successful candidates was never mentioned in his alternate article He was the only MBA applicants had been enrolled in the application can not be pytysnr PPS counselor to live for, new foundations were retribution without having any substance lawyer for the authorities. All questions raised by the Constitution applicant's lawyer were rejected. Ed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• NABI BUX JAHEJO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Agriculture 2010 PLC(CS) 902
• BANK OF PUNJAB v. FIRST NATIONAL EQUITIES LIMITED 2010 CLD 903
• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 907
• Mst. AFROZE alias AFSHAN v. State 2010 MLD 907
• SHAHEEN MULTI FOODS (PVT.) LTD. (FLOUR MILLS) through Chief Executive v. ABDUL HAFEEZ RAJPUT 2010 CLC 908
• MEHBOOB AHMAD SOOMRO v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 911
• SADIQ BROTHERS v. II-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE KARACHI South 2010 MLD 913
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 914

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

best law firm from Qalandarabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes