Find a Lawyer

BANK OF PUNJAB versus FIRST NATIONAL EQUITIES LIMITED

Articles 9 and 10 of the claim for defense of the suit to recover the treasury, or the request for leave from the defendant to terminate the claim or raise the claim, thereby extending such claim Will not be entitled. The color of a suit established under such a special law will change. Such a claim can be properly dealt with by a court of competent jurisdiction in which the banking court may also grant such leave by a separate action in accordance with the law. Was rejected in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS v. PAK ARAB RAFINERY, KARACHI 2010 PTD 900
• MUHAMMAD SHAHID v. State 2010 YLR 901
• ZAFAR H. ISMAIL v. Mrs. RUBINA ALI AAMIR 2010 YLR 902
• NABI BUX JAHEJO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Agriculture 2010 PLC(CS) 902
• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 907
• Mst. AFROZE alias AFSHAN v. State 2010 MLD 907
• ZOHAIB HASAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH 2010 YLR 908
• SHAHEEN MULTI FOODS (PVT.) LTD. (FLOUR MILLS) through Chief Executive v. ABDUL HAFEEZ RAJPUT 2010 CLC 908

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

best advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes