Pre-arrest of Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 365 and 392 kidnapping and robbery interim bail, there is no confirmation of any allegation against the accused that they have harmed or abducted the alleged kidnapper in any way. Was attacked and he was demonstrating on his own. Within a day, the statement was issued by the accused as the statement made by the complainant did not inspire confidence. No witnesses to the incident were on record and the complainant's relative who accompanied him Had told the complainant about the incident, they were not mentioned in the FIR, they were not eyewitnesses to the incident nor did they make such claim in their statements under section 161, PCFIR , Revealed that the alleged kidnapper himself appeared the next day when the FIR revealed that the complainant had received information about the incident at his workplace. I received information that if no other incident witnesses, how the complainant found out the identity of the accused persons, clear and clear contradictions were found in M. Important facts between the statements in the FIR and the statements under Section 164, all the said factors recorded by the alleged abductor of the PCP, need further investigation and to establish a reasonable case for grant of bail. Enough of the complainant's residence was at one place, about M 33 km from the place where he allegedly met with the kidnappers, it seems that he was guilty of the charges, accused. That he has filed a case for pre-arrest bail approval, his interim pre-arrest bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
