Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HUSSAIN RAMZAN ALI versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI

Section 196 Law E Shant (10 of 1984), Article 85 Reference Limitation Advice Knowledge Transfer of Counsel The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 17 2 1998 and this order on the petition filed by the appellant on 29 7 2006. It was postponed before the High Court that the order was not issued by the appellate tribunal in connection with the various letters written to provide a copy of the verdict, the authorities admit that the appellate tribunal The order passed by was sent to the appellant by registered post, the documents of the appellate tribunal were public and the accompanying limit The dedication is no need to take the post and confirm receipt of the dispatch order supplies register for this order was appealed all the way to a consultation and can not be pulled any negative points. Limit and High Court refuses to apologize for delay

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• FAZAL-E-RABBI v. JUDGE BANKING COURT 2010 CLD 972
• NABI BUX alias NABOO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 979
• NAZIMUDDIN v. S.M.E. LEASING LIMITED 2010 CLD 981
• IMAMDAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 986
• MEHRAN METAL CONTAINERS (PVT.) LTD. v. NATIONAL REFINERY LTD. 2010 YLR 991
• Mst. SHAHIDA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 992
• HAFIZUR REHMAN v. FRESH FARMS (PVT.) LTD. 2010 CLD 999
• Mst. SEEMA BEGUM v. Syed GHULAM HAIDER 2010 MLD 1000

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top advocates from Minchanabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes