Section 497 Control of Narcotic Material Stances Yield Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) drug bail owner, 1100 grams of marijuana was allegedly recovered from the possession of the accused, of which 200 grams were set aside for chemicals. The analysis was done by the FIR did not disclose whether the sample was taken from every piece of intoxicating substance, not even the alleged ban pattern, size and number of fragments. Was taken as a model under the law, even at the bail-out stage and not the full-fledged items, under the Drug Control Act of 1997 Under H9, the conviction, which was made on the basis of the quantity of drugs recovered, was banned by the prosecution to prove the whole of the substance recovered as intoxicating substance. A change in the amount of substance can seriously affect a person's life. The prosecution's charge in connection with the recovery of a particular substance, therefore, must be rigorously investigated and proven to be true. At that stage, the case against the accused apparently fell under section 9 (b) of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 and his crime required further investigation, as it was a fully recovered substance. So far, the accused was admitted on bail despite being found to be intoxicated in the case
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
