Definition of Section 2302 (b) Qatil-Aid Proof In the absence of the incident, the prosecutor relied on circumstantial evidence that the deceased had free access to his home, which identified the location of the incident. And he got it. Nash, who was injured and whose thumb was injured, did not prove that the accused had gone to the deceased's house or police had access to the complainant only on the basis of the disclosure which revealed the wounds. Was. The accused's hand, which was a hearsay evidence, did not bring any medical evidence to the record, and the prosecution tried unsuccessfully to prove the injuries through contradictory and defective evidence to prove that the accused was a police party. Was taken to the scene of the incident. No independent and controversial evidence to support the acquisition of fingerprints from the scene and the accused, no dependency partner, should be placed on the opinion of a finger print expert when it was not known whose Such an opinion is based on the finger. None of the articles recovered in this case were presented to the court, nor was there any report of the Chemical Examiner on record. To show that the knife dress and blood stains were hidden, probable evidence of the victim's blood stained led to the prosecution's failure to prove the suspect's testimony to the prosecutor's witnesses that he was 13/14 police. He remained in custody and tortured to give evidence against the accused and was pressured that he had signed the documents at the police station, was unauthorized and the accused was acquitted.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
