Find a Lawyer

DEEN BROTHERS & CO. THROUGH PARTNER versus GULSHAN-E-IQBAL TOWN COMMITTEE THROUGH TOWN NAZIM

Nos. 34 and 89 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), section 42 cancellation of allotment of plots allotted for social purposes and declaration on the ground and suit for adjournment to the plaintiff which was plotted to the plaintiff. There was no and the allotment could not be canceled The defendants contested the case on the basis that the leased plot was a welfare plot allocated to the park and permanently enjoyed by residents in the evening for outdoor activities. Was used on, the trial court, the appellate court ordered the trial of the appellate court, it was allowed and the trial Court orders placed aside. The trial court discussed the evidence and concluded that the plot on the lease was not a conspiracy but was not affiliated with the Martial Law Order [Zone C]. ], No 34 nor 89 applied to the lease on the plot which the High Court granted the request for review.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ALLAH WARRAYO alias JABBAL v. State 2010 YLR 1178
• Mst. AQEELA HAI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through the Secretary Land Utilization Department 2010 MLD 1180
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), MCC OF PREVENTIVE, KARACHI v. Shaikh NASIR ALI 2010 PTD 1183
• Brig. (R) ABDUL QAYUM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1197
• MASROOR HUSSAIN v. Shaikh ABDUL ZAHID 2010 YLR 1201
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Divisional Head (Law) v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, COLLECTORATE OF SALES TAX AND EXC 2010 PTD 1203
• ABDULLAH KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1207
• Mrs. RUBINA FAIZ v. UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI through Vice-Chancellor 2010 PLC(CS) 1208

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Larkana lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes