Find a Lawyer

MRS. RUBINA FAIZ versus UNIVERSITY OF KARACHI THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR

Article 199 The petitioner's complaint that the constitutional petition was dismissed was that he was mistakenly discharged from the service. Was the secretary at BPS. The petitioner could never be appointed by the selection board and was appointed by the director general for a limited period only on the basis of the contract, which expired, after the expiry of the contract. Was retired and was not employed in the High Court. The applicant's use of the constitutional jurisdiction was denied to interfere with the termination of the service

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• DEEN BROTHERS & Co. through Partner v. GULSHAN-E-IQBAL TOWN COMMITTEE through Town Nazim 2010 CLC 1200
• MASROOR HUSSAIN v. Shaikh ABDUL ZAHID 2010 YLR 1201
• STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Divisional Head (Law) v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, COLLECTORATE OF SALES TAX AND EXC 2010 PTD 1203
• ABDULLAH KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1207
• ISMAIL v. State 2010 MLD 1211
• KHATRI BROTHERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division and Chairman Federal Board of Revenue, Is 2010 PTD 1225
• ISMAT ASAD v. PAKISTAN OXYGEN LIMITED 2010 CLC 1226
• SAEEDUR REHMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1226

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Manoabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes