Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GULZAR AHMED versus STATE


Defining the testimonies of Sections 15 and 48, the lack of sufficient evidence available to convict the two accomplices, stated that the two defendants failed to deny or allege the testimony, they sentenced in favor of the accomplices, And confessed to their punishment. , Did not appeal the sentence, however, he requested to reduce his sentence to imprisonment, which he had already passed, saying that nothing was available to show. The co-accused were involved in any criminal case prior to the current trial. Having been in detention for less than ten months was the type of punishment he was given for a crime he committed. The appellant said that the co-accused was dismissed for suppression, but his sentence was limited to the sentence he had previously passed, which could be released immediately.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.