Find a Lawyer

AYAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

An attempt to compel Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 murder staff, the defendant's denial was immediately referred to the FIR filed within 45 minutes of the incident. The fire was the result of firearms being a key factor. His pistol was repeatedly injured by a fire, which intended to cause the victim to be injured from the side, the suspect was also recovered from the crime and medical evidence was also based on ocular evidence. There was ample evidence of a prima facie case for involvement in the crime that came under the prohibition clause of section 497; the CCP accused failed to present his case for grant of bail, for bail. Request for was dismissed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• GULZAR AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1438
• SHAHNAWAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1458
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2010 YLR 1459
• AXACT (PVT.) LTD. Through Company Secretary v. ASAD MANZOOR 2010 MLD 1460
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. IST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 1472
• GHULAM ASGHAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1474
• M. MUHAMMAD SHAFI & CO. v. A. REHMAN ENTERPRISES 2010 CLC 1477
• MUHAMMAD MUKEEM alias MUKEEM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1479

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Gari Mori lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes