Find a Lawyer

INSAAF versus STATE

The application for one of the fugitives was not considered at the time of the declaration of the suspension verdict of Section 426 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302 (b) of the convicted MD, his application for suspension of the sentence was not considered, He subjected the victim to hockey, while the other accused was accused of stabbing a knife while he is a civil servant, giving him an opportunity to serve his department until the appeal is decided. Not suspended. In connection with the other accused, the appeal decision was rejected as it is said that the accused stabbed the deceased while the third accused was absconding at the time of the announcement of the verdict.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ALLAH NAWAZ v. State 2010 MLD 1412
• ALLAUDDIN ABBASEY v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, New Sindh Secretariat, Karachi 2010 PLC(CS) 1415
• ABDUL WAHAB v. Mrs. SHAHANA NASIM 2010 YLR 1418
• SAJID BIN WAJID A. SAYED v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER HYDERABAD 2010 PCrLJ 1421
• UMMAR KHAN DURANI v. MUHAMMAD HAMAYOON KHAN 2010 PCrLJ 1431
• MUHAMMAD SOHAIL SIDDIQUI v. Mst. PARVEEN alias MUNNI 2010 MLD 1433
• MONAZZA OBAID v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION (PIAC), through Managing Director 2010 PLC(CS) 1436
• GULZAR AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1438

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top advocate from Ghotki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes